The varsity arranged, paid for, and booked tickets for Leifer and four of her eight children on an aircraft that departed at 1:20 am the same night, with out having informed the police. This marked the end of a four year long interval throughout which the district found itself embroiled in various transgender locker room access instances. As earlier than, the district had a period for public remark, which was considerably more supportive of Student A's case than the earlier one. In July 2019, the Illinois Human Rights Commission discovered that Lake Park Community Highschool District 108 discriminated towards a former, transgender student by allowing him to alter within the boys' locker room with the requirement that he use a privacy curtain. The group, Parents for Privacy (generally known as D211 Parents for Privacy, Students and Parents for Privacy, or simply PFP), said that the federal government violated the students' privacy rights as effectively as the mother and chaturbate money father' constitutional rights to "instill moral requirements and values in their kids". On May 26, 2016, Student A, two younger transgender students (called Students B and C), and the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance filed a movement to intervene in the PFP lawsuit. On November 30, 2017, Nova Maday, a transgender senior at Palatine High school, filed a state lawsuit in opposition to District 211 with the help of the ACLU and a Chicago legislation agency.

The law was in the end handed in June 2014 after the regulation of lolicon anime and manga was faraway from the invoice. On January 25, 2018, Judge Thomas Allen denied her request as a result of the Illinois Human Rights Act required only "entry" to school facilities, as a substitute of "full and equal access" which was faraway from the ultimate draft of the bill. In January 2018, PFP and the Thomas More Society successfully intervened in Maday's lawsuits as defendants. The Thomas More Society and the Alliance Defending Freedom supported PFP within the go well with. Nova Maday, a transgender student who filed swimsuit towards the district over locker room access, informed The Daily Herald that she was "ecstatic" that the policy had handed. At the final board meeting the place public comments were heard, 15 folks spoke in favor of unrestricted locker room access, and 10 people spoke in opposition to it. Over the course of 4 public conferences, the board heard quite a few feedback from the group in regards to the proposed policy change. On September 12, 2019, District 211 Superintendent Dr. Daniel Cates issued a press release through which he proposed a policy that may enable transgender students unrestricted locker room access corresponding to their gender identity. As a part of the proposed coverage change, college students who requested extra privateness in the locker rooms would obtain lodging.

Superintendent Cates mentioned that Maday's lawsuit misrepresented the accommodations the district had made for her. On its Facebook web page, PFP announced that the top of the lawsuit did not imply that its fight was over. In July, PFP dropped the Department of Education and Department of Justice as defendants because under the Trump administration they had rescinded the Obama-era policies which interpreted Title IX as requiring faculties to supply locker room access based mostly on gender identity. Unlike Title IX, the Illinois Human Rights Act explicitly prohibits discrimination based mostly on both sex and gender identity in public high faculties. On May 4, 2016, a bunch of District 211 students and parents sued the district, Department of Education, and Department of Justice in federal court docket, alleging that allowing Student A access to the girls' locker room was a violation of their civil rights. Alonso said that there was "no indication that anything has negatively impacted" the schooling of the PFP college students. On November 14, 2019, the Board of Education voted 5-2 to allow transgender students unrestricted locker room access.

On May 13, 2016, the Department of Education and Department of Justice issued a "Dear Colleague" letter which updated the federal government's official view on Title IX. Title IX doesn't expressly prohibit discrimination primarily based on gender identification, but it does expressly prohibit discrimination primarily based on sex in schools receiving federal funding. Under these pointers, OCR wouldn't require colleges to present gender id-based mostly bathroom and locker room entry to transgender students. In August 2016, PFP sought an injunction which might temporarily stop transgender college students from any access to the college locker rooms which matched their gender id. Maday sought an injunction which would quickly remove the requirement that she change in private in the girls' locker room. Maday appealed the ruling of Judge Allen. ACLU spokesperson Ed Yohnka told The Daily Herald that the ruling from the Human Rights Commission may bode effectively for Maday's case, as he felt that Judge Allen's ruling towards her did not mirror the calls for of the Illinois Human Rights Act as clarified by the commission.